JUST EDITED TO INCLUDE: I DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE THINK BARACK OBAMA IS SOME KIND OF MARTYR WHO HASN'T DONE ANYTHING WRONG... BUT IN MY OPINION HE IS WELL AND BEYOND THE BETTER CANDIDATE WITH THE BETTER CHARACTER AND THE ONE WHO PLAYS FAIRLY...
I HAVE, AS OF LATE, BEEN COMPLETELY TURNED OFF FROM THE POLITICAL DOWNWARD SPIRAL THAT IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. I CAN'T EVEN WATCH ANY OF THE NEWS SHOWS I USED TO BE GLUED TO BECAUSE IT USUALLY TAKES UNDER 3 MINUTES BEFORE I GET REALLY PISSED OFF.
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW YET, BARACK OBAMA ACTUALLY WON TEXAS. THE SAME WAY HE ACTUALLY WON NEVADA BY DELEGATES. IN TEXAS, HILLARY WON THE POPULAR VOTE, BUT OBAMA WON THE MOST DELEGATES, 99 TO HER 94. ALTHOUGH THE MAJOR NEWS OUTLETS WILL NOT REMOTELY SUGGEST THAT CLINTON DID INDEED LOSE ONE OF THE TWO "BIG MUST-WIN" STATES SHE CLAIMS TO HAVE WON UNTIL MARCH 29th WHEN THE STATE OF TEXAS WILL CERTIFY THESE RESULTS.
AND BARACK IS 20 POINTS DOWN IN PENNSYLVANIA RIGHT NOW. SO, WHEN HE COMES BACK TO CUT THAT MARGIN THREE FOLD AND MAYBE EVEN WIN, I AM QUITE SURE THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN WILL PUSH YET ANOTHER STATE ASIDE TO SAY THAT HE IS THE FRONT RUNNER SO THEY EXPECTED THIS TO HAPPEN.
BOTTOM LINE IS THAT OBAMA IS AHEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE, IN THE DELEGATE COUNT, AND IN THE STATES WON ACROSS THE COUNTRY. WHAT AMAZES ME IS THAT THE CLINTON'S SEEM TO WANT TO BRING DOWN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BY RIPPING US IN HALF. I DON'T SEE OBAMA OR ANY OF HIS PAID SURROGATES PERSONALLY ATTACKING HILLARY'S CHARACTER. BUT EVERYTIME I TURN ON THE TV THERE IS A NEW STORY ABOUT HER, HER HUSBAND, OR ONE OF THEIR PAID SURROGATES SAYING UNNECESSARILY RUDE COMMENTS ABOUT OBAMA THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ISSUES.
I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN WILL CHEAT, LIE AND STEAL THEIR WAY INTO THE NOMINATION. CLEARLY THEY ARE NOT AFRAID TO STOOP TO ANY LEVEL TO CAST OBAMA IN A BAD LIGHT. THANKFULLY HE CHOOSES NOT TO PERSONALLY ATTACK HER BACK BUT THE DAMAGE IS DONE REGARDLESS. AND I FOR ONE, WILL NOT VOTE FOR A CHEATER, A LIAR AND A CANDIDATE WHO COMPROMISES THEMSELF BY CONSISTENTLY CHOOSING TO BE SURROUNDED WITH LOW-LIFE BULLY'S AND PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT IT IS OKAY TO SAY OR DO ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED. I ALREADY DID THAT IN 2000. AND I THINK IT'S AN OBVIOUS UNDERSTATEMENT TO SAY THAT I LEARNED A BIG LESSON BY DOING THAT IN 2000. CLINTON IS RUNNING HER CAMPAIGN LIKE GEORGE W. BUSH. SHE IS DEMEANING, FEAR-MONGERING, CALLOUS AND A COMPLETE SEPARATION OF WHAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS SUPPOSED TO STAND FOR.
ANYONE SEE HER LAME 3am AD??
OR HEARD THE DISGUSTING PAID ADVISOR NAMED GERALDINE FERRARO SAY THAT THE ONLY REASON OBAMA IS WHERE HE IS, IS BECAUSE HE'S A BLACK MAN??
OR CLINTON'S SECOND-IN-COMMAND SAY TODAY THAT "THERE IS NO WAY OBAMA CAN WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION"???
MARK PENN
KARL ROVE
LOOK AT THIS MAN. MARK PENN. BEARS A STRIKING RESEMBLANCE BOTH PHYSICALLY AND IN HIS WORDS TODAY PROCLAIMING "OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION" TO NONE OTHER THAN KARL ROVE AND HIS REJECTION OF DECENCY IN HIS POLITICS. THIS IS CLEARLY NOT THE CASE SINCE OBAMA IS BEATING CLINTON IN EVERY SINGLE POLL WITH HIM VS. McCAIN IN NOVEMBER.
AND AS FAR AS OBAMA'S FORMER PASTOR'S REMARKS, WHICH HE HAS DENOUNCED VIGOROUSLY, PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO WATCH COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMAN TONIGHT AT 8pm OR ANDERSON COOPER 360 at 10pm TO HEAR OBAMA SPEAK ABOUT THIS SITUATION HIMSELF BEFORE PASSING JUDGEMENT.
SEE THIS?
THE KITCHEN SINK. THAT'S WHAT THE CLINTON'S ARE THROWING AT OBAMA RIGHT NOW, WHICH IS WHY HIS PASTOR, WHO HE CLEARLY HAS DISTANCED HIMSELF FROM FOR QUITE SOME TIME, IS HIS PASTOR AND NOT AN ADVISOR OR ON THE PAYROLL IN ANY WAY. ALL THEY HAVE ON OBAMA IS STUPID CRAP LIKE THIS TO ATTACK HIM ON. PATHETIC IF YOU ASK ME...
BARACK OBAMA'S TOTAL NET WORTH IS 1.3 MILLION DOLLARS. THE CLINTON'S ARE WORTH AN ESTIMATED $160 MILLION DOLLARS. WE MIGHT ACTUALLY KNOW HOW MUCH THEY ARE REALLY WORTH AND WHERE THEY HAVE ACTUALLY GOTTEN THEIR MONEY FROM IF THEY WOULD ACTUALLY RELEASE THEIR TAX RETURNS ALREADY. OBAMA DID THAT OVER A YEAR AGO AND HAS ALREADY DONE THAT FOR THE 2007 TAX YEAR. WHAT IS HILLARY HIDING?? SHE IS THE ONLY ONE TO HAVE NOT RELEASED HER TAX RECORDS OUT OF ANYONE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT THIS YEAR IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. HELL, I THINK EVEN McCAIN IS GOING TO BEAT HER TO THE PUNCH.
I WOULD JUST LOVE TO KNOW WHY THIS IS SO DIFFICULT FOR HER TO DO.
SPEAKING IN TERMS OF THE SO-CALLED "TRANSPARENCY" SHE SPEAKS OF, BESIDES NOT RELEASING HER TAXES I ALSO FIND IT PECULIAR THAT OUT OF THE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS RELEASED FROM THE CLINTON WHITE HOUSE ERA, THAT HER SCHEDULE, MEETINGS AND MEMOS ARE THE ONLY DOCUMENTS YET TO BE RELEASED. WHICH BRINGS THE QUESTION... HOW CAN YOU CLAIM YOUR TIME AS FIRST LADY IN THE LAUGHABLE 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE YOU TOUT AS YOUR MAJOR STRENGTH AGAINST YOUR OPPONENT WHEN YOU REFUSE THE RELEASE THE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO VALIDATE THAT "EXPERIENCE"?? I THINK THE REFUSALS TO RELEASE SAID INFORMATION ABOUT TAXES AND ACTUAL EXPERIENCE ARE FAIR POINTS TO QUESTION HER ON.
AS A SIDE NOTE, AND JUST MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE OF COURSE, BUT I WOULD PREFER TO HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO ACTUALLY HAS HAD TO STRUGGLE LIKE THE REST OF US. IN THE OBAMA'S 2006 TAX FILINGS IT IS LEGALLY PROVEN THAT THEY PAID OFF THEIR JOINT STUDENT LOANS BETWEEN 2005-2006. I FEEL LIKE I WILL PAYING MINE OFF FOREVER. IT'S NICE TO KNOW THAT THE PERSON I SUPPORT AS PRESIDENT KNOWS WHAT THIS FEELS LIKE.
IT'S CALLED BEING IN SYNC WITH THE AVERAGE AMERICAN'S PROBLEMS. WHILE BILL CLINTON HAD A ROUGH UPBRINGING HIS WIFE DID NOT. SHE MAY HAVE WORKED (ACTUALLY IT WAS AN INTERNSHIP, BUT WHY BOTHER CLARIFYING) FOR THE CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND FOR A SINGLE YEAR, BUT TO SUGGEST THAT SHE HAS ANY CLUE AS TO THE PLIGHT OF THE AVERAGE AMERICAN IS RIDICULOUS. HER "35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE" ARGUMENT ONLY PROVES TO ME THAT SHE HAS SPENT 35 YEARS LEARNING HOW TO BE A GOOD POLITICIAN. NOT THAT SHE HAS LEARNED WHAT THE EVERYDAY AMERICAN DEALS WITH. I COMPARE IT TO ONE SUPERVISOR I HAVE HAD WHO HAD BEEN IN HER POSITION AND OUT OF THE ACTUAL FIELD ACTUALLY WORKING WITH CLIENTS FOR SO LONG THAT SHE HAD NO IDEA WHAT PEOPLE TODAY ARE DEALING WITH. ONCE YOU ARE PUT ON A PEDESTAL FOR A LENGTH OF TIME IT IS EASY TO FORGET WHAT IT IS REALLY LIKE TO BE ONE OF THE REST OF US.
SO, YEAH. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR A CHEATER OR A DECEIVER. I WILL NOT SUPPORT A PARTY THAT OPTS TO PLAY ON AN UNEVEN PLAYING FIELD. NEITHER OF THESE CANDIDATES WILL REACH THE NECESSARY DELEGATE COUNT BEFORE THE CONVENTION. IT'S A MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY. BUT WE ALL KNOW WHO IS AHEAD IN ALL CATEGORIES AND WHO WILL REMAIN AHEAD UNLESS OBAMA LOSES EVERY SINGLE STATE BY 40-50% THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THIS PROCESS. AND IF THE CLINTON'S THINK THEY CAN MANIPULATE THEIR WAY INTO THE NOMINATION COME CONVENTION TIME AND AFTER LOSING THE MOST STATES, BEING BEHIND IN THE DELEGATE COUNT AND IN THE POPULAR VOTE THEY ARE CRAZY TO THINK THAT THEY WILL WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION AND EVEN CRAZIER IF THEY THINK THAT THEY WILL NOT BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE (ALONG WITH HOWARD DEAN, OF COURSE)FOR HANDING JOHN McCAIN A WIN IN NOVEMBER AND CAUSING A MAJOR TEAR WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AS A WHOLE BY STEALING THIS NOMINATION FROM OBAMA. AND, IN MY OPINION, THIS TEAR WILL HAUNT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR DECADES TO COME.
AND, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, WHEN YOU HAVE RUSH LIMBAUGH ON AIR DAILY ENCOURAGING HIS DEVOTED REPUBLICAN AUDIENCE TO VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON SO THAT McCAIN CAN BEAT HER TO A PULP IN NOVEMBER (MEANING OBAMA CAN ACTUALLY BEAT McCAIN) YOU MIGHT WANT TO START LOOKING AT THE BIG PICTURE CALLED YOUR PATHETIC, GRASPING AT STRAWS AND 110% NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN AND RE-THINK WHAT IS BEST FOR YOUR PARTY.
I WILL NOT SUPPORT ANOTHER TERM DEALING WITH WHAT THE WORD "IS" IS, NOR WILL I SUPPORT A CANDIDATE THAT ATTACKS THE CHARACTER OF A GOOD MAN WHO IS NOT ATTACKING HER OWN. IF IT'S CLINTON/McCAIN THAT EQUALS 4 MONTHS OF FEAR-MONGERING VS. FEAR-MONGERING. IF IT'S OBAMA/McCAIN ITS 4 MONTHS OF PAST VS. PRESENT.
YOU DECIDE. I ALREADY HAVE. AND I AM STICKING TO MY WORD ON THIS ONE...
